๐ŸŒฒ Forest and trees v.2026-09-10 โ€” tree crown benchmark๏ƒ

This page details the validation of tree crown polygons produced by the ๐ŸŒฒ Forest and trees v.2026-09-10 model on 7 areas of interest (AOI), compared against the previous version v.2026-07-03. For each AOI the two crown-mask results are shown side by side; click any image to open it full size, and use the โ† / โ†’ arrow keys to browse between them.

Metrics are area-based on the crown masks: IoU is the intersection-over-union of the predicted and ground-truth crown masks, and F1 / Precision / Recall are computed on the overlapping mask area. Crowns is the number of detected crown polygons; the ground-truth crown count and the relative count error are reported below each AOI (see also the Tree count accuracy table on the model page). Evaluation run: 2026-10-01.

โ† โ†’ to browse ยท ESC to close

Mask colour legend: v.2026-09-10 ยท v.2026-07-03

Italy โ€” Crotone๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.842

0.914

0.930

0.898

254

v.2026-07-03

0.825

0.904

0.925

0.884

254

Ground-truth crowns: 327. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 22.3%; v.2026-07-03: 22.3%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Italy โ€” Crotone
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Italy โ€” Crotone
v.2026-07-03

Argentina โ€” La Banda๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.624

0.769

0.700

0.852

111

v.2026-07-03

0.575

0.730

0.691

0.774

83

Ground-truth crowns: 125. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 11.2%; v.2026-07-03: 33.6%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Argentina โ€” La Banda
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Argentina โ€” La Banda
v.2026-07-03

Spain โ€” Rus๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.689

0.816

0.759

0.883

239

v.2026-07-03

0.567

0.723

0.671

0.785

249

Ground-truth crowns: 258. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 7.4%; v.2026-07-03: 3.5%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Spain โ€” Rus
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Spain โ€” Rus
v.2026-07-03

Philippines โ€” Balanga๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.780

0.876

0.849

0.904

309

v.2026-07-03

0.782

0.878

0.860

0.896

220

Ground-truth crowns: 193. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 60.1%; v.2026-07-03: 14.0%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Philippines โ€” Balanga
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Philippines โ€” Balanga
v.2026-07-03

Spain โ€” Cuenca๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.732

0.846

0.875

0.818

433

v.2026-07-03

0.728

0.842

0.868

0.818

409

Ground-truth crowns: 321. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 34.9%; v.2026-07-03: 27.4%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Spain โ€” Cuenca
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Spain โ€” Cuenca
v.2026-07-03

Spain โ€” Velilla de San Antonio๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.694

0.819

0.855

0.786

1,134

v.2026-07-03

0.667

0.800

0.831

0.771

1,070

Ground-truth crowns: 1,212. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 6.4%; v.2026-07-03: 11.7%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Spain โ€” Velilla de San Antonio
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Spain โ€” Velilla de San Antonio
v.2026-07-03

Spain โ€” Madrid๏ƒ

Model

IoU

F1

Precision

Recall

Crowns

v.2026-09-10

0.823

0.903

0.907

0.899

398

v.2026-07-03

0.801

0.889

0.879

0.900

368

Ground-truth crowns: 478. Relative count error โ€” v.2026-09-10: 16.7%; v.2026-07-03: 23.0%.

v.2026-09-10 โ€” Spain โ€” Madrid
v.2026-09-10
v.2026-07-03 โ€” Spain โ€” Madrid
v.2026-07-03

Summary๏ƒ

For tree crown polygons, v.2026-09-10 improves on v.2026-07-03 across the 7 AOIs: mean area-based F1 rises from 0.824 to 0.849 and IoU from 0.706 to 0.741, with gains in both precision (0.818 โ†’ 0.839) and recall (0.833 โ†’ 0.863). It leads on F1 in 6 of the 7 AOIs and is on par at Balanga (0.876 vs 0.878).

On tree count accuracy the picture is mixed. Where the previous model under-detected, v.2026-09-10 is markedly closer to the true crown count (La Banda 33.6% โ†’ 11.2%, Madrid 23.0% โ†’ 16.7%, Velilla de San Antonio 11.7% โ†’ 6.4%). But in two dense-canopy AOIs it over-segments the canopy, producing more crowns than the ground truth (Balanga 60.1% vs 14.0%, Cuenca 34.9% vs 27.4%), which raises its mean relative count error to 22.7% versus 19.4% for v.2026-07-03 across all 7 AOIs. Mask-overlap accuracy (IoU / F1) still favours v.2026-09-10 in those areas; reducing over-segmentation in dense canopy is the focus for the next iteration.